The article that I choose make a critic about the sequel of The amazing spider man, (2014). It talks about how unnecessary is that movie, we are used to this kind of film and then make a little ironic review about the script (and the acting)
It stars saying that is nobody needs another movie of the heroes of marvel, unless the Stan Lee's financial advisers and freakies comics obsessed because who made this movie only can brag about the new effects, and the movie can’t hold it for itself, because it seems more like a serie, or sequence.
This film, where act Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone, show the backstory of Peter’s parents, and his childhood and a man who falls into a vat of eels and becomes in him future supervillain enemy named “Electro”, who is, according to the writer, the attraction of the film, besides for all the effects and the light that the character means to the movie.
Another critic that make this writer is when the action seems to get close to the climax, they (the film-makers) came with two action more, is a abuse way to prolongated the movie.
Finally, it seems for this article that the only that it works for this movie is when the principal actors get “insouciant “ or when someone whistles the theme classic of Spider-man.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteIt is possible that the world can live without The amazing Spiderman 2? If the answer was obvious to you, get your own conclusions...
ReplyDeleteeffects, lights, and beauty faces are not enough for a good movie!
ReplyDeleteI had seen the final of this movie about 20 times, because I'm working in the cinema
ReplyDeleteI wanted to watch this movie, maybe still want to, to see by myself how it doesn't work (?)
ReplyDelete