South Perk

Well, not many people think that this cartoon is good, or mature, but who cares?

When I was about six years I remember stay awake specting that this cartoon appear on tv, I don’t remember why I liked so much, I only remember say “I’m waiting for the cartoons of the  snow” and wait after midnight hidden of my parents. I’m talking about South Park.

Obviously I didn’t  understand anything and with time South Park lose any sense to me, because nobody in my family or my friends even, like it because they found it common and rude, what they never understood was the truth. Like Trey Parker and Matt Stone, the creatives. says, it doesn’t matters how the characters talk or express itself because the kids sometimes know more about bad words than adults think. This people create this cartoon about 1992, they make a short movie who came a success on internet (some people says that would be one of first viral videos on internet), they decide make a serie and sell it to MTV, who until now still playing this cartoon in its channel.

I’m still look at it, it seem to me that the black humor and irreverence that South Park shows its amazing. It is about four kids who live the day with extraordinary things and characters (included Mohammed, Jesus, Michael Jackson and lately Papa Francisco) Its names are: Stan Marsh,(the normal) Kyle Broflovski(the intelligent and jude) ,Eric Cartman(the fat, racist, arrogant and mocking) and Kenny McCormick.(who always dies)  They lives in Colorado, in South Park, an imaginary place, have nine years old.

This cartoon not always only amuses me, theres times that they not only make parodies about the reality of United States but make a very deep criticize hide in the silly thing that could happen in South Park.

Without title 01

I know that I will be judged. Recycle is something  that I’m not used to. I’m more close of economize. There was a time, I remember, with my family started to collect all kind of papers and cartons that we stop use, but we stop doing to with time. I don’t really know why I don’t have so much commitment, I’m more like a person that prefers help animals, (I admit it was since my pet disappear)  but I wouldn’t join on any organisation, I know its not exclusive, but its the same. I feel so selfish, because I always think that I have something to resolve in “my” life before star to act. But that never happen. I’m happy for the people who can go anywhere in its bike, but I don’t have the courage (and good healthy)

Generally speaking, I don’t have many consciousness about this topic, I do thing like don’t use plastics bags or safe energy (anywhere) water or don’t use sprays. Somehow I would like to start to separate the trash, and go on bike, I really would like do something like that…

There things that bothers me so much here in Santiago, that I don’t seeing yet in another places. Sometimes the people is used to be rude, above all when through the trash anywhere, I think it lack awareness, not only for the planet, but for the people who lives there too-

Bye!

the news

I don’t usually see the news, not for lack of interest but for lack of time (and little trust on the media) Lately I been heard about one law about a group of intelligence that would be created in Chile. This group has its mission discover who make disturbance in the march of the students, “The hooded people”, this initiative was made for foreman of Santiago, Claudio Orrego, for stop the delinquency in the pacific protest…


This story is interesting for so many reasons, the first one is because all of us may accept the fact that the hooded are people who ruin the march, so this way the government can make a institution for this problem, but also they can ignore the deep reason. I agree, the violence it's unnecessary, but what happen when this violence comes from the special forces or even worst, pay attention… They are saying that the students can be able to march pacificly, wherever they want, whenever they want, without riot, I mean WE CAN DO ANYTHING WE WANT, but always the way they want.


Its interesting how they can focus the circus in one side, and make all of us make an opinion about it without even realize what its the problem. Maybe to protest is not the way anymore if its like they want to we can claim.

The "Amazing" Spider-man... 2

http://www.theguardian.com/film/2014/apr/20/amazing-spider-man-2-review-cgi-pizzazz

The article that I choose make a critic about the sequel of The amazing spider man, (2014). It talks about how unnecessary is that movie, we are used to this kind of film and then make a little ironic review about the script (and the acting)

It stars saying that is nobody needs another movie of the heroes of marvel, unless the Stan Lee's financial advisers and freakies comics obsessed because who made this movie only can brag about the new effects, and the movie can’t hold it for itself, because it seems more like a serie, or sequence.  

This film, where act Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone, show the backstory of Peter’s parents, and his childhood and a man who falls into a vat of eels and becomes in him future supervillain enemy named “Electro”, who is, according to the writer, the attraction of the film, besides for all the effects and the light that the character means to the movie.

Another critic that make this writer is when the action seems to get close to the climax, they (the film-makers) came with two action more, is a abuse way to prolongated the movie.

Finally, it seems for this article that the only that it works for this movie is when the principal actors get  “insouciant “ or when someone whistles the theme classic of Spider-man.